Legal Opinion

Webber v. Bolte

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Ionia. (Y. H. Smith, J.) GARNISHMENT. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, J«

Two of the questions which were argued in *114this case seem to us to require no discussion, and we simply announce our conclusions.

1. The court should not have dismissed the case against the garnishees. The ground of the dismissal was delay in the proceedings. The case was begun September 16, 1881, and was being tried in December, 1882, when the trial judge on his own motion dismissed it, relying upon Blake v. Hubbard 45 Mich. 1, for his authority. The defense raised no question of laches, and it is shown that jury trial had been demanded, and it could not have been tried at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blake v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pettus v. Dudley Bar Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Dinkins v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Walker v. Paramount Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Aigeltinger Co. v. Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Kiely v. BertrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API