Legal Opinion

Kiely v. Bertrand

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Boseommon. (Fallass, J.) Suit in garnishment. Garnishee brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Eugene Kiely commenced suit in assumpsit against William Morrison, and garnished the defendant.

Interrogatories were filed, and a written disclosure made, from which it appeared that whatever indebtedness had existed between defendant and Morrison was under a written contract to do a job of logging for defendant, in which contract this clause occurs:

“The second party reserves the right of knowing that labor bills are paid before paying any final amount due first party, in order to protect himself from labor liens.”

It further appeared from the disclosure that Morrison failed to complete the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blake v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Webber v. BolteMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joy v. Two-Bit CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Walker v. Paramount Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Royal York of Plymouth Ass'n v. Coldwell Banker Schweitzer Real Estate ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Simmons Hardware Co. v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API