Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Deaton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1942No. 6 Div. 30PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Certain related aspects of this litigation were decided by this Court in the case of Ex parte Deaton et al., 6 So.2d 593, 1 where we held that the proper procedure for a transfer of the cause from the law to the equity docket was by petition filed on the law side under the provisions of section 153, Title 13, Code of 1940.

Facts sufficient for an understanding of the treatment of the matters now before the Court can be found in Ex parte Deaton, supra. See, also, Deaton v. Deaton Truck Lines, 242 Ala. 91, 4 So.2d 895.

After the writ of mandamus was awarded in Ex parte Deaton…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. WilmarthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Burnett Bean v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Tecumseh Iron Co. v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Parker v. OlliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Wilkins v. AmeriCorp Inc. (In re Allegro Law LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  3. Alabama Butane Gas Co. v. Tarrant Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Lauderdale County Co-op., Inc. v. LansdellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API