Legal Opinion

Smith County v. Thornton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1986No. C-4315PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAY, Justice.

This appeal presents the issues of whether the Open Meetings Act requires literal compliance and whether a county has the power to close a portion of a county road. We hold that Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6252-17, § 3A(h) (Vernon 1985) requires literal compliance and that a county commissioners court, subject to certain restrictions, has the power to close a county road.

The trial court denied respondents’ prayer to enjoin Smith County from closing a portion of Jim Hogg Road and to declare void all actions taken by Smith County pursuant to the commissioners court meeting of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Robison v. Whaley Farm CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Meyer v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Moore v. Commissioners Court of McCulloch CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Morriss v. CassadyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Point Isabel Independent School District v. Hinojosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. City of Fort Worth v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Piazza v. City of Granger, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. Dallas County Flood Control District No. 1 v. Cross, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API