Smith County v. Thornton
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAY, Justice.
This appeal presents the issues of whether the Open Meetings Act requires literal compliance and whether a county has the power to close a portion of a county road. We hold that Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6252-17, § 3A(h) (Vernon 1985) requires literal compliance and that a county commissioners court, subject to certain restrictions, has the power to close a county road.
The trial court denied respondents’ prayer to enjoin Smith County from closing a portion of Jim Hogg Road and to declare void all actions taken by Smith County pursuant to the commissioners court meeting of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Robison v. Whaley Farm CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Meyer v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Moore v. Commissioners Court of McCulloch CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Morriss v. CassadyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Point Isabel Independent School District v. Hinojosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- City of Fort Worth v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Piazza v. City of Granger, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Dallas County Flood Control District No. 1 v. Cross, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.