Wall & Ochs, Inc. v. Grasso
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DALY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation with six Connecticut retail outlets engaged in the sale and fitting of prescription eyeglasses, seeks a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the enforcement of certain Connecticut statutes and regulations governing opticians and retail optical outlets. The defendants are Ella Grasso, Governor of the State of Connecticut; the Connecticut State Commission of Opticians and five of its members; and the Connecticut Opticians Association, Inc.
The complaint is in three counts. The first…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dionne v. BouleyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- DiMaggio v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Kline v. J. I. Case Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Wall & Ochs, Inc. v. HicksDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1979
- Alabama State Federation of Teachers v. JamesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.