Legal Opinion
Quiming v. International Pacific Enterprises, Ltd.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 31, 1990No. Civ. 89-00979 HMFPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AKC CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT INTERNATIONAL PACIFIC ENTERPRISES, LIMITED’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FONG, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On November 26, 1990, the court heard defendants’ two motions for summary judgment. Defendant AKC Corporation (hereinafter “AKC) has filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts. Defendant International Pacific Enterprises, Limited (hereinafter “IPEL”) has filed a motion for summary judgment on IPEL’s counterclaim and against Plaintiff on Count III of the plaintiffs’ complaint.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- James Wactor, Darlene Wactor v. Spartan Transportation Corporation, Also Known as Spartan Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. Cenac Towing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- Hare v. Graham Gulf, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Parker v. Jackup Boat Service, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.