Legal Opinion

Simpson v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1933No. 31,204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Claimant was employed by the city in its street department. While breaking cement in repairing a pavement a small particle of cement struck him in the eye, resulting in impaired vision. He made claim /or compensation. The commissioner of compensation heard the evidence in order to make a record which could be reviewed, but held *916the parties were not subject to the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act and denied compensation. Claimant appealed to the district court. The court reviewed the record,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Tierney ex rel. Tierney v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Roberts v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Early v. BurtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Wichita v. WymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Kopplin v. County of SedgwickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Tilton v. Riley CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API