Legal Opinion

Worley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1925No. A-4935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, was convicted of the sale of one-half pint of whisky. His punishment was assessed at 90 days in jail and a fine of $300.

Felix Sanders testified that he purchased three pints of whisky from the defendant at a certain barn in Stil-well. There was no other direct testimony of the sale.

Upon the question of sale the defendant testified in his own behalf as follows:

“Q. Mr. Worley, you heard Felix Sanders testify about the alleged purchase from you on the 20th of December, last year. Did you sell Felix Sanders any whisky? A. No, sir.
“Q. Do you…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GleimMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. ShockleyUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Grubbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Greene v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Spradling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API