Legal Opinion

Steven Durst v. Matthew Durst

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 2016No. 15-4045UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Steven Durst and Reuben Durst appeal from orders of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which granted summary judgment motions for all Defendants, and denied the Plaintiffs’ motions to amend them complaint and their motion for reconsideration. We will affirm the District Court’s orders and final judgment.

Because we write primarily for the parties, who are familiar with the background of this case, we discuss that background only briefly. This litigation • involves the Jake Ball Trust (the “Trust”), initially established by Steven Durst (“Steve”) as a…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Washington v. HOVENSA LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Blystone v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Michael Kopec v. Tyrone Tate, Officer Township of WhitemarshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Murray v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beberman v. U.S. Department Of StateDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2019
  2. Borden v. Mainline Conveyor Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
  4. J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. MAGLIETTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SHORELINE FOUNDATION, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API