Legal Opinion
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Komondy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 30, 2010No. AC 29665Published
1Opinion of the Court
991 A.2d 587 (2010)
120 Conn.App. 117
MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY
v.
Marguerite A. KOMONDY.
No. 29665.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Argued April 15, 2009.
Decided March 30, 2010.
Robert T. Rimmer, for the appellant (defendant).
Heather J. Adams-Beman, for the appellee (plaintiff).
BEACH, ROBINSON and McDONALD, Js.
BEACH, J.
The defendant, Marguerite A. Komondy, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the application to confirm an arbitration award filed by the plaintiff, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company, and denying her motion to vacate the award. The defendant claims that the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hallas v. Boehmke & Dobosz, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Northrop v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Twenty-Four Merrill Street Condominium Ass'n v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.