In re Satt
Michigan Supreme Court
Habeas corpus by Louis Satt against James Russell, warden of the branch of the State’s prison at Marquette, to determine the legality of petitioner’s detention.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.
The return made by the warden shows that the petitioner is in custody by virtue of a commitment issued out of the recorder’s court of the city of *473Detroit, and a copy of the commitment is exhibited. It recites that on November 10, 1908, upon his plea of not guilty and after trial, respondent was convicted “of having on the 17th day of September, A. D. 1908, committed the crime of uttering and publishing a forged and counterfeit instrument at the city of Detroit, county of Wayne, Michigan,” and on August 30, 1909, said court determined and adjudged that he should be committed to the State’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re EckartSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In re CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- In re BusheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- In re LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PriceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- In re JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Elms v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Batley v. Ritchie, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- In re ForscuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.