Vincent v. Fuller Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Richard G. Vincent brought this action against his former employer, Fuller Company, and GATX Corporation, its parent company, alleging that the termination of his employment constituted unlawful discrimination on account of age. The common pleas court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding that because Vincent had failed to file a timely complaint with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, he was precluded from asserting this cause of action under the Human Relations Act. Superior Court re versed, 400 Pa.Super. 108, 582 A.2d…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Harrity v. Medical College of Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Holocheck v. Luzerne County Head Start, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Yeager v. UPMC HORIZONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.