Legal Opinion
State, City of Oakdale v. Curtis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 9, 1986No. C7-86-509PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal is from a pretrial order dismissing the charges against respondent David Curtis on the ground that he was denied his right to a speedy trial. Curtis has failed to file a brief, and this matter is proceeding under Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 142.-03. We reverse and reinstate the charges.
FACTS
On October 29, 1985, Curtis was charged with three traffic offenses: driving while under the influence (Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (1984)), driving with an alcohol concentration of over .10 (Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1984)), and driving left of the roadway center…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. FribergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Amended September 14, 2015 State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael GaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael GaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.