Legal Opinion

West Omaha Investments v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 48

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1988No. 86-532PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Following the demurrer of Sanitary and Improvement District No. 48 of Sarpy County, Nebraska (S.I.D. No. 48), the district court dismissed plaintiff’s fourth amended petition because of failure to state a cause of action and because of the expiration of the statute of limitations.

In its first petition, plaintiff stated that it owned real estate located within the boundaries of Sanitary and Improvement District No. 51 (S.I.D. No. 51). It further alleged that in order to provide adequate water for fire protection, S.I.D. No. 51 contracted with the defendant, also a sanitary and improvement…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Vermeer Ex Rel. Vermeer v. SnellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Kohler v. Ford Motor CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States v. G. v. Johnson, and His Wife Letha JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Campbell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Chicago Lumber Co. v. School District No. 71Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Millman v. County of ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Willis v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Myears v. Charles Mix CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Genthon v. KratvilleNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API