Legal Opinion
Potts v. Howard University Hospital
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 8, 2010No. Civil Action No.: 04-1856 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, a male, brings this action against his former employer, Howard University Hospital (the “Hospital” or the “defendant”), asserting claims of disparate treatment based on his gender and retaliation, in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. code § 2-1402.11 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Emory v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Taylor v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Cheatham v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021