Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Federal National Mortgage Association
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 25, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-1189PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Keith Taylor (“Taylor”) seeks declaratory relief and damages for alleged retaliatory employment termination. Taylor alleged that defendants, Fannie Mae and David Magidson (individual, “Fannie Mae” and “Magidson”, or collectively “defendants”), retaliated against him by wrongfully terminating his employment because he raised concerns that Magidson was reporting fraudulent data to federal regulators. Taylor alleged that his termination violated the Dodd-Frank Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6 (2012), and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hall v. Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Stewart v. Everyware Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014