Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Johnson

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 15, 2010No. Civil Action 08-639-SLRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner David J. Buchanan (“petitioner”) is a Delaware inmate in custody at the Sussex Correctional Institution in Georgetown, Delaware. Presently before the court is petitioner’s amended application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (D.I. 25) For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that the application is mixed because it contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Therefore, the court will provide petitioner with the option of withdrawing the unexhausted claim and proceeding only with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ameziane v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Swan v. CoupeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
  3. (HC) Burgess v. The People of the State of CADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Great Lakes Tower, LLC v. Cameron Wire & Cable, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Holtzman v. Village Green Management Company LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API