Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Corey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Clare. (Hart, J.) Trespass. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

• Montgomery, J.

This is an action of trespass. At the trial the plaintiff showed that the lands upon which the alleged trespass was committed were wild and unoccupied, and that no one had ever been in the possession of the-same, except the defendants, while committing the alleged acts of trespass. The plaintiff’s sole evidence of title was in a warranty deed executed by one Edmund Hall and wife to plaintiff on November 13, 1890. The court instructed the jury that this evidence of title was prima facie.

This ruling was erroneous. There was evidently a misapplication of the rule in Gamble v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gamble v. HorrMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Smith v. LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metzger v. EllisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Arnold v. BrechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Solomon v. WidnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Seymour v. BruskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API