Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Widner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Iosco; Simpson, J. Trover by Selig Solomon against-John A. Widner for the conversion of certain timber. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant for the conversion of 303 cedar trees. Defendant appeals.

The suit 'was commenced in justice’s court. The declaration was oral “for the conversion of 350 cedar trees severed from the freehold from the southeast quarter,” etc. It was the claim of the defendant that he had nothing to do with the cutting of the trees, but that they were cut by mistake by Mr. Colton, who was in the employ of Mr. Ayer. The defendant claimed he was also in the employ of Mr. Ayer.

The record shows the land from which the trees were cut was wild land. Plaintiff obtained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific Life Stock Co. v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Seymour v. BruskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API