Legal Opinion

Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'n v. Feichtinger

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1999No. S-8069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A municipal employee sued his union for breach of the union’s duty of fair representation because it refused to represent him in an arbitration in which he unsuccessfully challenged his termination. The superior court denied the union’s motion for summary judgment, and the union now petitions for review of that denial. We hold that if a union’s breach of its duty of fair representation seriously undermines the integrity of the arbitral process, the arbitration decision may lose its preclusive effect. We conclude that a genuine issue of material fact…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kent v. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'n v. FeichtingerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API