Legal Opinion

Hellmich v. Hellman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1927No. 7298PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court and will for convenience so be designated here. Likewise plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover certain additional income taxes alleged to have been erroneously assessed and collected from him for the calendar year 1919. " Defendant demurred to the petition. The trial court overruled the demurrer. Defendant electing to proceed no further, judgment was entered for plaintiff. The statements of the petition, taken as true for the purposes of the demurrer, establish that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Edson v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Jemison v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  4. Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. North American Creamery Co. v. WillcutsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API