Legal Opinion

Jemison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1930No. 5575PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

On November 12, 1920, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined a deficiency of income taxes against the petitioner for the year 1919, based on the failure of the taxpayer to include as a profit for that year $29,456.41, his share of the surplus of' a corporation which had been distributed, and assessed a penalty of 50 per cent, for fraudulent concealment' of the same, under the provisions of section 250, Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1082). The taxes and penalty assessed amount to $10,830.99.' On appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals the ruling of the Commissioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. F. Vitelli & Son v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Langstaff v. LucasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1925
  4. Hellmich v. HellmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Langstaff v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Grace M. Powell, of the Estate of O. E. Powell, Deceased v. Ralph C. Granquist, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Davis Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Estate of Spruill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. Snead v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Griffiths v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API