Legal Opinion
In Re Hageman
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided February 17, 1989No. 19-00068PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL J. MELLOY, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Re: Confirmation of Plan
The matter before the Court is the Internal Revenue Service’s objection to the confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan. The Internal Revenue Service is requesting this Court to determine that a Chapter 13 debtor must pay interest on claims allowed as unsecured priority claims under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7), when the Plan provides for deferred payments on these claims. The Chapter 13 Trustee recommends that the plan be confirmed. No other objections to the plan were filed.
BACKGROUND
Roger Joseph Hageman (“Hageman”)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re RidgleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1987
- In Re ReichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- In the Matter of Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Still v. Tennessee, Department of Revenue (In Re Rogers)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of EatonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1991
- In Re JourdanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989
- Boone v. I.S.S.C. (In Re Boone)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1997
- Holway v. United States (In Re Holway)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- In Re AllenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1999