Legal Opinion

Hill v. Riddle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1912No. 2141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Pontotoc County Court; W. G. Currie, Special Judge. Action by W. R. Riddle against W. W. Hill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court November 22, 1910. No brief has been filed by either-party, and it is evident that the appeal has been abandoned. The petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hass v. McCampbell, City ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Maddin v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. McClelland v. WitherallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API