Legal Opinion

Evangelist v. Bellern Research Corporation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 13, 1967No. 44,799PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’Connor, J.:

This products liability action was instituted by the plaintiff, Felix A. Evangelist,' to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a partially filled Pepsi-Cola bottle broke as he was recapping it with a device known as a “Handy Dandy.” Motions for a directed verdict on behalf of all the defendants were sustained at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and he has appealed.

The defendants are Bellern Research Corporation, the manufacturer of the “Handy Dandy”; Brockway Glass Co., the manufacturer of the bottle; Conway Springs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Brown v. HardinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Potwin State Bank v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Brooks v. DietzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Garst v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Wilcheck v. Doonan Truck & Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Goff v. American Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API