In Re Shenandoah LLC
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Shenandoah, LLC, David Shlansky, Ting Chang, and other entities and individuals appeal from the Environmental Court’s summary judgment decision upholding an Act 250 jurisdictional opinion. They challenge the court’s attribution of certain development and subdivision activities to Shlansky and Chang. Appellants also argue that “person-based jurisdiction” under .Act *151250 violates the Vermont Constitution. Appellants failed to preserve their constitutional argument, and we do not address it. We affirm the court’s jurisdictional opinion.
¶ 2. Appellants have a variety of overlapping…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In re SpencerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Lussier v. TruaxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
3Cited by17 opinions
- Debra Morisseau v. Hannaford BrothersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- H&E Equipment Services, Inc. v. Cassani Electric, Inc. & Nicholas CassaniSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In re Essex Search WarrantsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In Re Appeal of RumseySupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Berger v. RootVermont Superior Court · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.