Legal Opinion

Heda v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1990No. A050282PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STRANKMAN, J.

Petitioner, a defendant in a medical malpractice action (hereafter defendant), challenges an order requiring him to answer interrogatories about his doctors’ diagnoses and to furnish his health records to real party (the plaintiff below; hereafter plaintiff). Plaintiff needs the records to support a motion for trial preference based upon defendant’s ill health. (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (d).) We conclude that this need does not outweigh defendant’s interest in privacy.

Article I, section 1 of the California Constitution provides: “All people are by nature free and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Britt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. GherardiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Wilkinson v. Times Mirror Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Wood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pagano v. Oroville HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
  2. Chantiles v. Lake Forest II Master Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Lantz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Bearman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API