Groff v. Friedline
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by-plaintiff from affirmance by the Oity Court, General Term, of a judgment, in favor of. the defendant;
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The complaint alleges that between June 16, 1893, 'and July 1.7, 1894, the firm, of Benedict & Fowler sold and delivered to the defendant merchandise amounting in value to $3,902.40, on which there was a balance of $600 due, and that subsequently, and on December 12, 1894, the firm made a general assignment to the plaintiff for the benefit of creditors, whereby the cause of action became vested in him.
The defendant pleaded certain set-offs, which were allowed by the jury, and about which no serious contention is made on this appeal, and alleged by way of counterclaim that on or about November…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Arnstein v. HaulenbeekNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
- Claflin v. New York Standard Watch Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- John Church Co. v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Groff v. BlissAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896