Arnstein v. Haulenbeek
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term.: Action by Emanuel Arnstein against Ellen A. Haulenbeek on an account stated for goods sold and delivered. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff, and a motion by defendant for a new trial was denied. From a judgment entered on the verdict, and the order denying a new trial, defendant appealed to the general term of the city court, which affirmed the judgment and order, and from that judgment plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
The appeal is fi-orn a judgment of the general term of the city «court affirming a judgment on a verdict, and from an order affirming an order denying a motion on the minutes for a new trial. The action is upon an account stated for goods sold and delivered. The answer is a general denial. That the goods were sold and delivered, and that the balance claimed has not been paid, were conceded facts on the trial. The only issues litigated were "the statement of account, and the liability of defendant.
Upon the appeal from the order, defendant’s contention is that the verdict is .against the weight…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Aldridge v. . AldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Porter v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Myers v. CohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Dearing v. PearsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Paige v. ChedseyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Eckensberger v. AmendNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Gundlin v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.