Groff v. Bliss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
MoAdam,-J.
The action was by the plaintiff, as general assignee of Benedict & Fowler, to recover $686.38. He claimed that. Benedict & Fowler had, between May 4, 1893, and Hoy ember 13, 1894,- sold building materials to the defendant of the value- of $4,292.05, and that-they received, on account, notes on which the *15defendant, was entitled to a credit of $3,606.57, the difference between these amounts being the balance sued for. On December 12, 1894, Benedict & Fowler made the assignment for the benefit of creditors under which the plaintiff acquired title.
The defendant set up in her answer,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Lindsay v. Jackson & McJimpseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Bagley v. . BoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Hushes v. WheelerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
- Martin v. . KunzmullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McConnell v. Louherm Operating Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943