Legal Opinion

Youngworth v. Stark

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1991No. A051761PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

—Plaintiffs/appellants Dianne Youngworth and Eugene Hrynkiewicz appeal a judgment dismissing their personal injury action against defendants/respondents Jennifer and Phyllis Stark due to appellants’ counsel’s failure to comply with local delay reduction (fast track) rules. They also appeal the denial of their motion to vacate the judgment of dismissal. We affirm.

Procedural History and Facts

In March 1990 appellants’ attorney, Brian Workman, filed a complaint for personal injuries on their behalf in Humboldt County Superior Court. At the time, Humboldt County was voluntarily…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Barrington v. A. H. Robins Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cottle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Wantuch v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Marriage v. KeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Boyle v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Estate of MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API