Legal Opinion

Roesler v. Denton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1965No. 5-3562PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.

This suit concerns damage to real property.

Appellants Roseler own residential property in Fort Smith, bounded on the north by Park Avenue; and on the east by a natural drainage course which ran under Park Avenue through a culvert, and over as well as under Park Avenue during heavy rains. As a part of the local highway program, this section of Park Avenue was included in what is called the Fort Smith Spur. The level of Park Avenue was raised ádjacent to appellants’ property and after the highway construction ivas completed, appellants discovered that the new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. PartainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Bryant v. Ark. State Highway Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Southeast Construction Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Light v. BlackwellDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1979
  2. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Austin v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ChoateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Andrus v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API