Legal Opinion

Birkenwald Distributing Co. v. Heublein, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 1989No. 23114-6-IPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

Heublein, Inc., a wine supplier, canceled a wine distribution agreement with Birkenwald Distributing Company. Birkenwald sued Heublein for wrongful termination under the wholesale distributors and suppliers of wine and malt beverages act. Birkenwald also alleged tortious interference, claiming a $200,000 loss as a result of the cancellation. The trial court held the act inapplicable to preexisting distributorships and dismissed the claim for tortious interference. We affirm.

Facts

Birkenwald became Heublein's distributor in 1969. The president and chief executive officer of Birkenwald described…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Tyrpak v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mearns v. ScharbachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API