Legal Opinion

Feist v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1956No. 7526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the District Court of Burleigh County upon appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau. The case is before us for the second time. Upon the first appeal two questions of fact were presented for decision. The first was whether the illness of respondent’s deceased husband with atypical pneumonia was fairly traceable to his employment. The second was whether two cerebral hemorrhages suffered by respondent’s husband and his resulting death were also fairly traceable to his- employment. The first of these questions was decided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Booke v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kamrowski v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Feist v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Boe v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kuntz v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mickelson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API