Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This comes before the Court on a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint and in the alternative for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiff is a licensee under a license issued by the Federal Power Commission and operatés a hydroelectric plant for the generation of electricity on the Susquehanna River at Safe Harbor about eight miles south of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff’s principal office and principal operating office are located in this judicial district.
Under date of June 11, 1940, the Commission issued an order requiring plaintiff to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Red Rock v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Johnson v. Glock, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021