Legal Opinion
Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 2, 1941No. 7544, 7688, 7689PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
We are here concerned with a petition to review aii order of the Federal Power Commission issued by ft on June 11, 1940 allegedly pursuant to Section 20, Part I of. ' the Federal Power Act. The petitioner, Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation, operates a hydroelectric power plant on the Susquehanna River at Safe Harbor, Pennsylvania, under a fifty year license issued to it in 1930 by the Federal Power Commission-. Under a long term contract expiring in 1980, Safe Harbor sells all of the electrical energy created by it to its two parent companies, Consolidated Gas Electric…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore (Public Service Commission of Maryland, Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases). Pennsylvania Power Utility Commission v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.