Legal Opinion

Tudor Iron Works v. Weber

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 4, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County ; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.

Appellee brought suit against appellant to recover for personal injuries received on the 8th day of December, 1886. The declaration contains four counts. The first count alleges that plaintiff was working as a laborer in defendant’s mill; that a certain coupling in the mill was so negligently repaired that it was left in an unsafe and dangerous condition; • that plaintiff not knowing that fact, being ordered by the foreman, who gave no warning of danger, to oil certain journals, and whilst doing so was caught by the bolts of the coupling and injured.

The other three counts are similar, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. WelchIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Indianapolis Bloomington & Western R. R. v. FlaniganIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldie v. WernerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Rice & Bullen Malting Co. v. PaulsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  3. Jackson v. Yak Mining, Milling & Tunnel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. JohnsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API