Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Yak Mining, Milling & Tunnel Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1911No. 6472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Lake District Court — Hon. Charles Cavender, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

delivered1 the opinion of the court:

Action for damages upon account of personal injuries. At the close of plaintiff’s case the defendant *553upon motion was granted a non-suit; the plaintiff brings the ease here for review upon error.

The rule of law relied upon to reverse the judgment is the rule which requires the master to furnish for his servant a reasonably safe place in which to work. The main contention is in the application of the rule to the facts, rather than oyer the rule itself.

For about two years prior to the accident the plaintiff had been in the employ of the defendant company as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  2. Grant v. VarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Kelley v. Fourth of July Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. IngrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrew B. Hendryx Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Cohen v. SchaetzelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API