Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Bloomington & Western R. R. v. Flanigan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. John Burns, Judge, presiding. This was an action on the case, by Michael J. Flanigan, against the Indianapolis, Bloomington and-Western Bailroad Company. The opinion of the court states the nature and facts of the case - with sufficient fullness. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the circuit court, for the sum of $6000, from which the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

Plaintiff in this suit was a freight conductor on defendant’s railroad. While in that service, it was a part of his duty, when occasion required it, to couple cars. He had been directed to leave at Mansfield station four empty freight cars belonging to the Baltimore and Ohio Bailroad Company. It was about midnight when he arrived at the station, and, in setting off the cars, he found it would be necessary, in order to clear the crossing, to couple one of them with a White Line car that had previously been standing on the side-track. Both cars had attached what are called “double buffers,” the…

2Cited by40 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HeereyIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Missouri Furnace Co. v. AbendIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Malott v. SampleIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API