Legal Opinion

La Duke v. Township of Exeter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Monroe. (Kinne, J.) Negligence ease. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

One of tbe plaintiff's borses caugbt bis *452hind foot in a hole in defendant’s bridge, and, while struggling to free himself, got the other hind foot in also, and fell upon his knees. The plaintiff sent his wife for help, and attempted to hold the horses until assistance should arrive, to prevent injury to the imprisoned horse by his struggles or by his mate. While so engaged plaintiff was injured by the struggles of the horse.

It is contended by defendant’s counsel that the negligence of the township in failing to keep- its bridge in repair was not the proximate cause of the injury. We think…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. BucksportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
  2. Stickney v. Town of MaidstoneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  3. Tillotson v. WebberMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barker v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Brugh v. BigelowMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Radley v. SeiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Sanborn v. Income Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Taylor v. Home Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API