Legal Opinion

Kirschenman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1994No. A066767PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

Petitioners (defendants below and their attorney) seek a writ to vacate an order sanctioning them for failing to personally attend a mediation session and requiring them to participate in further mediation. Plaintiffs, real parties in interest, respond by urging us to rule that once an attorney orally agrees to mediate a dispute neither that attorney nor the client may withdraw consent absent court approval upon a showing of good cause; we hold otherwise. We grant relief because (1) the court had no authority to mandate mediation; (2) there was no enforceable agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. AMF INC. v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Lu v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API