Legal Opinion

Lu v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1997No. G020650PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

We hold that under the California Standards of Judicial Administration for Complex Litigation (Cal. Standards Jud. Admin., § 19; hereafter complex litigation standard or the standard), a trial court has authority to appoint a discovery referee, even in the absence of a current discovery dispute. In such a complex case, the court also has authority to appoint the referee to conduct settlement conferences.

Facts

This is a construction defect case with a large number of separately represented parties. The trial court determined the case was complex and should be dealt with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cottle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. McDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. DeBlase v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Kirschenman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Soliz v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. First State Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API