Legal Opinion
United States v. Hanlin
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 23, 1962No. 21142PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, District Judge.
Defendants have been indicted by a Grand Jury for violations of Sections 1341 and 371, Title 18, U.S.C. in an indictment of some 28 counts. The indictment charges defendants jointly and severally with scheming “to defraud purchasers and prospective purchasers of certain vending machines sold by Hanlin Manufacturing Company or Midwest Manufacturing Company, and to obtain money and property from such persons by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, well knowing at the time that the pretenses, representations and promises would be falsely…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. O'CONNORDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- The PEOPLE v. CanadayIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Loyd Carl Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Walter E. Fisher v. United States of America, Joseph E. Lindquist v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.