Legal Opinion

State v. Santamaria

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 5, 2000No. 98-719PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Paul Santamaría, appeals his conviction in the Superior Court (Smith, J.) of one count of first degree assault in violation of PSA 631:1 (1996) following a jury trial. The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and whether the court erred in permitting a police officer to testify as an expert witness. We affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence would support the following factual findings. While attending a party at his fraternity, the victim overheard the defendant make a sexual comment to a group of girls. The victim ascertained that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. State v. McClarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. McMinnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. State v. StauffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BurkhartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Baker Valley Lumber, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. State v. MacInnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. State v. Samuel PennockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API