Legal Opinion
State v. MacInnes
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 23, 2005No. 2003-594PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Bradley J. MacInnes, appeals his conviction following a jury trial for felony criminal threatening with a firearm. See RSA 631:4, II (a)(2) (Supp. 2004). He argues that the Trial Court (Vaughan, J.) erred in ruling upon: (1) the admissibility of certain evidence; (2) his motions for directed verdict and for a mistrial; and (3) his request for a curative instruction. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. On May 31, 2002, Jeremy Poljacik (victim) and Rocky Marsh went to Pine Tree Lane Apartments to visit friends. They stopped in the parking lot to talk to a friend of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. LampreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LamySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Cloutier v. City of BerlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. MateySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.