Legal Opinion
In Re Rhodia S.A. Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 2007No. MDL 1714; Civil Action 1:05 Civ. 5389(DAB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEBORAH A. BATTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are a putative class of investors who held securities of Defendant Rho-dia, S.A. (“Rhodia”) between April 26, 2001 and March 23, 2004. The lead Plaintiffs are foreign corporations. They allege that Rhodia and the other Defendants fraudulently inflated Rhodia’s worth to the investing public. Plaintiffs have brought their claims pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act (“Section 10(b)”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, as well as pursuant to Section 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act (“Section 20(a)”).…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Dell Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. DunnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Security Capital Assurance, Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re SCOR Holding (Switzerland) AG LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- E. Armata, Inc. v. ParraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.