Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1914No. 3386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Brror from County Court, Tillman County; T. B. Campbell, Judge. Action by W. R. Bennett against C. W. Jones and D. D. Shofner as individuals, and Jones & Shofner, copartners, composed of C. W. Jones and D. D. Shofner.' Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for damages for breach of contract, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, individually and as partners. The parties hereafter will be called plaintiff and defendants respectively as they were designated in the court below. The allegations of the petition as to the nature of the contract out of which the controversy arose, are to the effect that the plaintiff and defendants entered into a verbal contract, whereby it was agreed that, if the plaintiff would construct a certain store building in the town of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  3. Willet v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Brown v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Collins-Deitz-Morris Co. v. Elk City Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hoffman v. PettawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Longmeyer v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Rossiter v. Citizens' State Bank of MincoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API