Legal Opinion

Dingler v. Simpson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1961No. 8989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Defendant-appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company takes this appeal from a district court money judgment. The judgment is predicated upon an alleged agreement whereby the insurance company insured defendant, cross-claimant and respondent Peterson, and thereby became liable for a judgment against Peterson in the sum of $4,831.38 obtained in another action by plaintiffs, the Dinglers.

All events occurred in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

On March 30, 1955, defendant Peterson, an automobile salesman, telephoned an agent of the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts Distributing Co. v. Kaye-Halbert Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Robertson v. DodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Gramkow v. Farmers Cooperative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Washington Brick, Lime & Sewer Pipe Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commercial Insurance Co. v. Hartwell Excavating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Perkins v. Highland Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Martin v. WhiteleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Commercial Insurance Co. v. Hartwell Excavating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Perkins v. Highland Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API