Legal Opinion
Bond v. Brown
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 2, 2021No. 6:20-cv-01656Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION JAMES-BRENT BOND, Civ. No. 6:20-cv-01656-AA Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. KATHERINE BROWN; STATE OF OREGON, Defendants. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. Plaintiff James-Brent Bond seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff also moves for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) enjoining enforcement of executive orders aimed at curbing the ongoing pandemic. ECF No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion for TRO is DENIED.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.