Stewart v. Leiper
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Parker, J.,
Opinion by
The court below refused defendant’s motion for a new trial after verdict against him. The motion was grounded upon an allegation of after-discovered evidence which would contradict a part of the plaintiff’s own testimony and, if believed, tend to reduce the claim for damages.
The plaintiff had been a servant in the employ of defendant for about two and one-half years. While she was at the rear of defendant’s premises another servant opened a door and let out a Great Dane dog, weighing about 135 pounds. The dog made a dive for the plaintiff, who weighed 118 pounds, knocked…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Candelore v. GlauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pescatore v. SabatoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Rellick v. Redevelopment Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Indiana County1988
- Rispo v. Motor Freight Express, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975
- Temenoff v. EmeryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941