Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Leiper

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1940No. Appeal, 106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J.,

Opinion by

The court below refused defendant’s motion for a new trial after verdict against him. The motion was grounded upon an allegation of after-discovered evidence which would contradict a part of the plaintiff’s own testimony and, if believed, tend to reduce the claim for damages.

The plaintiff had been a servant in the employ of defendant for about two and one-half years. While she was at the rear of defendant’s premises another servant opened a door and let out a Great Dane dog, weighing about 135 pounds. The dog made a dive for the plaintiff, who weighed 118 pounds, knocked…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  2. Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Candelore v. GlauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pescatore v. SabatoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Rellick v. Redevelopment Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Indiana County1988
  3. Rispo v. Motor Freight Express, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975
  4. Temenoff v. EmeryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API